KulliRaivo
I appreciate you posting this but I think the news broke on that like week ago. https://www.reuters.com/world/greta-thunberg-alleges-torture-israeli-detention-after-gaza-flotilla-arrest-2025-10-07/ It seems she has since gone into more detail though
It creates a sync conflict file, so the data is there but the two differing versions aren’t automatically resolved.
One way out of this is to either have it on a server that’s always connected (less common) or to just have it on your phone. That way you have an intermediary that syncs the changes.
It’s funny but also if nothing else at least you get different sort of perspective here than in other places
Something funny about posting the question to .ml and seeing the renoved comments at the top hah
Well yeah that’s why talking about “oil rich Nordic countries” is stupid, only one of them is oil rich. That was the point
This isn’t actually true. You can look at the Nordic countries which are very oil rich and owe a lot of their prosperity to that.
Way to ruin WFH
it seems like I replied to the wrong person, not sure if that person meant to reply to me since I didn’t say anything about it being a true story.
Ah yes oil rich Finland
Wat. I’m talking about them saying it was eye opening lol
No worries, I have relatives with alcoholism too
Those look like canned champion mushroom, they have salt in them in my experience. What sort of herbs would you put on the sausages?
Can’t stand up when remote working
I meant the original topic of this discussion about non-liberal movements. Why you and Wikipedia consider MAGA (Trumpism) differently is, yeah that’s a discussion for some other day. The original topic is cleared up
I think you and Wikipedia disagree here. But that’s neither here nor there really. By their counting, there’s plenty of non-liberals who would fit the meme. In your view there aren’t. So that explains the difference.
I mean the whole point of bringing up Wikipedia was to show a common definition and what sort of movements are counted. If you use wider Marxist definition it covers a lot more, from what I’ve understood. The common Wikipedia counting doesn’t cover as much, so it leaves out some pretty popular movements, in which case the meme just mentioning liberals doesn’t make as much sense. But this being on .ml I think using the Marxist definition makes sense
I’m not sure it counts at Wikipedia, with how they describe it (they call it “Trumpism”)
comprises ideologies such as right-wing populism, right-wing antiglobalism, national conservatism and neo-nationalism, and features significant illiberal, authoritarian[7][8] and at times autocratic beliefs.[b] Trumpists and Trumpians are terms that refer to individuals exhibiting its characteristics. There is significant academic debate over the prevalence of neo-fascist[a] elements of Trumpism.
I mean I’m not sure if Wikipedia actually counts MAGA part of the party as liberals. I don’t think it does. That’s more along the lines of movements I was talking about. European alt-right the same deal.
But if you’re working from a specifically Marxist viewpoint I’m guessing it uses a broader definition that includes those movements.
Sure and it could be a salient point if it left out a few. It does tell you something when none of the parties in those movements are included though. Even in the articles for those particular ideologies you don’t see the claim that they’re subsets of liberalism, but a few mentions how they’re trying to counter liberal values.
I don’t think it’s an accidental omission.
What’s going on with your checkouts lol