• 0 Posts
  • 32 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2025

help-circle




  • No it just the ever growing feeling of sameness and nothing new coming up.

    As a young kid in the late 80s and early 90s I saw shit just go from big to bigger in only a few years. Jokes about computers becoming obsolete the moment they are shipped were everywhere. Graphics and computing power exploded in the 90s and all the way until the 2010s and… things didn’t seem to be that much different. A computer I would have had in 2000 would be aching for a replacement in 2005, and the same from 2005 to 2010 and so on. But now I feel like a computer I would have had from 2015 or 2018 would not be too far behind today.

    Maybe things got more efficient. But it just seemed like things haven’t changed that much. I mean they did. Cloud computing has gotten huge, but in terms of users and usability things haven’t budged.






  • If cyberpunk media taught me anything is that having anything in your body that isn’t 100% independent and only connects through a very secure wired network (no wireless!) On a need to do basis only.

    And even with wired connections… you guys know cyberpunk 2077, right? In the corpo life path the introduction literally has your boss fry the brains of a roomful of foreign VIPs like it was nothing and when his half-assed scheme to have you murder his boss (your boss’s boss) you get hired and all the implants they put in you become internal deadweights and the fact that they were managing your sky high stress levels means you immediately have a break down and faint due to sensory overload.

    This is not to mention the quick hacks in-game that can cause you great harm or even death if some script kiddie gets a hold of them.

    I really need to get back to creative writing and write the cyberpunk novel I have in mind of people jailbreaking the unjailbreakable devices and showing how the elites used ‘necessary’ implants to straight up kill their users if they are acting all ‘uppity’.






  • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.onlinetoMemes@lemmy.mlLiberals be like
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    They don’t care.

    Also they will claim that the death of communism is some widely agreed upon number that is corroborated by numerous organizations and sources.

    In reality it is literally like the one single ‘study’ that proved the autism/vaccine connection. It came entirely from the Black Book of Communism in 1999, and all but the main author disavowed it, and despite the obsession with wanting to reach 100 million. The absolute max it could find was 94 million with a ‘most likely’ number of 64 million.

    So when they give a death toll of ‘conservatively 100 million’ they are literally pulling it out of nowhere.



  • Damn fucking straight. I hope it starts an privacy movement so big they realize that all the laws passed since 2000 against terrorism were abject failures and repeal all of them.

    Canada is trying to pass major surveillance shit on par with the patriot act on steroids and effectively nullify the need for warrants, all in the name of ‘strong borders’ and anti terrorism even though it literally gives many US owned and operated companies full and complete access to digital information on Canadians, ironically weakening borders in every way.

    And for what? What is the terrorism threat? Al-Qaeda was a always a joke, and the fact that 9/11 happened was far more due to a monumental failure of all intelligence services combined and not due to a lack of resources. Terrorist schemes have been thwarted in the past without the need for extensive surveillance… and most plots are still thwarted primarily by informants and insiders speaking to authorities. The whole 'we need to be super proactive ’ has yielded shit results.

    Most of the stuff that they claim was 'prevented proactively ’ was literally entrapment. They found some mentally ill and/or lonely people who would have done nothing on their own, but ended up being goaded into stupid crap when undercover agents flirted with them, encouraged them, and even offered weapons and explosives for them to use, and if they agreed… well, that’s when they nabbed them. No terrorism would have occurred if agents didn’t do shit.

    Have you ever wondered why so many people are highly distrustful of people talking about doing violent shit? Fed posting? Its because agents have such a long ass history of doing that that you cannot tell who is and who isn’t a Fed.