cross-posted from: https://linux.community/post/3497784

Example: several of my former coworkers are from Mexico, Peru and Argentina, meaning they share Spanish as a common language.

I used to practice Spanish with them, but my last charge (like a ward’s manager) would yell at us to stop it, use English only. She would get very angry really fast if she heard anything in a language she didn’t understand.

I find it stupid, because some of them would use Spanish to better explain to the new nurses how to do certain procedures, but maybe I’m missing something?

      • very_well_lost@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Preserving “politeness” is the same tactic they use to keep workers from discussing their pay with each other, which is also deeply anti-labor.

        • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Sure, I won’t disagree that it’s anti labour, but being polite to and around your co workers is important

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I don’t agree. Forcing people to use a language they are less comfortable with just so others can eavesdrop has nothing to do with “politeness.”

        • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s not eavesdropping lol. I worked a company that was primarily Chinese people at the head office and they made a rule of speaking in English for inclusivity.

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            The post references any usage of spanish as bannable. There’s a difference between workers speaking spanish with each other while someone who only speaks English is present, and workers speaking spanish with each other when nobody else is involved with the conversation. I also worked at a company with a huge portion of speakers that were uncomfortable with speaking English despite myself only speaking English, any attempt to ban their language would hurt the company.

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                I am directly replying to the context listed out by the user, which in this case seems to be racist and anti-worker.

                • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  And I am directly replying to you saying there is context and I specifically said not always

                  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    It is always negative in the case of the user’s context with the information we have. You implied an entirely different situation, meaning it’s an entirely different question.

      • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Why do you care about what I do if I’m not talking you? If talking a different language seems impolite to you and you’re not the one talking, who the fuck cares? That’s a you problem.