Chat Control didnt pass - they didnt even vote because they were afraid the result would be embarassing.

And we got told so many times, that EU now wants Chat Control. But it was a big fat lie.

EU is a democracy with different opinions, and when a small group of facists tries to read your chats, it does not represent the EU opinion.

But the whole media got you thinking so. Proving even on Lemmy, you and me are extremly prone to propaganda.

I quoted the article here with the news:

In a major breakthrough for the digital rights movement, the German government has refused to back the EU’s controversial Chat Control regulation yesterday after facing massive public pressure.

The government did not take a position on the proposal.

This blocks the required majority in the EU Council, derailing the plan to pass the surveillance law next week.

  • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Is this some sort of misguided patriotism? I don’t see what the propaganda we are supposedly falling for is. Is it not as equally accurate to say that public opinion and outcry led to it not coming to a vote? I think keeping that public outcry is important to defeat future attempts to undermine rights. Don’t think it can’t happen in the EU. It’s happening if the US

    • themurphy@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m talking about all the opinions already made up, that EU wanted to take away encryption and give us chat control.

      They didnt want that.

      It’s like saying Denmark wants to throw out all immigrants, just because a small minority is proposing it. They dont.

      Democracy is just great for media outlets, because they can bandwagon stupid proposals.

    • Tryenjer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      The fact that these guys even proposed (and more than once) something that so profoundly violates the fundamental right to privacy of European citizens is cause for great alarm.

      OP’s post seems like propaganda to me and of the lazy kind.

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    What kind of nonsense is this writeup? Media “got to me”? Look, you see Denmark? You see how it’s in support of chat control?

    Yeah, that’s my country. So it’s a rather serious issue here.

  • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Maybe I don’t understand, but the fact there is a vote for it (or even just talk about it) is enough for me to warrant everyones immediate action.

    I’m glad the media got this to our attention asap, because we were able to react quickly (and stop this… hopefully its stopped and wont continue or come back).

    Edit: commented then read others, think ppl agree with this and they say it better than I have.

    P.s. i really don’t like this post and hopefully it doesn’t change anyones mind about action on this type of stuff in the future… we need action and to keep fightijg to keep our freedoms.

    • ChogChog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      “let your motto be ‘eternal vigilance is the price we pay for liberty.’”

      Freedom dies in the silence of the many at the hands of the few. We must always be adamant with opposition, because it’s hard to undo what has been done. The easiest way to put the genie back in the bottle is never letting it out in the first place.

  • HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    If that graphic is accurate, the media didn’t “get” anyone. Seems some countries are actually gun-ho with the elimination of privacy, and its a movement that doesn’t die with one failed vote.

    Y’all are getting too fucking comfortable. Authoritarianism is always around the corner, even when things feel safe.

  • Darkenfolk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    What kind of shit take is this?

    Media made people aware of ongoing bullshit, people reacted and put pressure on their governments and somehow “media got to us”?

    If anything it didn’t pass because of media attention.

    • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Yeah, keeping the public in the dark so people against it aren’t there to voice their opinion is how these like this get passed. Media attention to inform the public was a good thing.

  • Mechaguana@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    This is a terrible map, lumping neutral and opposed together? I am against chat control but ffs we don’t need more misleading media with the internet already dying under waves of automated misinformation

  • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    “Because there was push back and the EU decided to not go forward with a vote and be embarrassed, that means they never really wanted it at all” is one of the dumbest takes I’ve heard in a minute.

  • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Isn’t this how liberal democracies are supposed to work? How exactly did “the media” get the better of “us”?

  • xodoh74984@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I believe it should be all over the media to ensure that it never passes. Democracy dies in darkness. Name and shame those who supported it.

  • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Let’s not protest terrible ideas to not embarrass facists (who may or may not be part of your/our government) or what’s supposed to be the message here?

    • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      The message here is: “don’t believe when people start screaming that the EU is a fascist organisation that wants to subjugate the population”.

      Because there was A LOT of that online when Chat Control reared its head.

      • iii@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        That’s the same EU that mandates online de-anonymisation, punishable with up to a year in prison, as a last minute amendment to an unrelated CSAM-directive.

        Some press releases: (1), (2), (3)

  • cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Good news. But I’m downvoting that post. OP’s living in reverse crying-wolf land, it seems.

    First, Chat Control got further than previous attempts, with a bigger scope than ever. Being worried about that is not the result of propaganda.

    Second, a lot of countries where on board, including Germany. Stuff changed after lot of feedback. You can be cynical all you want arguing that “people’s voice don’t matter” and saying there’s no causality there, but people made themselves heard, and thing moved. There’s no telling what would have happened if they didn’t.

    The proposal being ultimately shot down (this time!) does not mean, at ALL, that it wasn’t a very dangerous one.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      This post reminds me of a bunch of the “y2k scare was a hoax and a waste of money!” stuff from back in the day. With a bunch of people not realizing how much shit was fixed and what massive success it all was.

  • sauerkrautsaul@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Yeah… no.

    Germany switched to opposed partially because people knew about it and contacted their representatives.

    They contacted their representatives because they heard about it… through the media.