• 0 Posts
  • 7 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2023

help-circle


  • The_v@lemmy.worldtoFunny@sh.itjust.worksEvolution of Windows
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Because of all your explanation, Terminal should never, ever be touch by the average user. The historical reliance on terminal is the reason that Linux adoption rates have been low.

    Linux is a far better system to use for most home users that windows or Mac but terminal is beyond the capabilities of 97% of people.

    I have a 11 year old low-end laptop running Mint. All I did was max out the RAM and pop in a SATA SSD. It’s stable, easy to use, and fast… until I have to hit terminal. Then it’s hours of looking up commands online, trying to figure out how to get something done that should have an easy GUI. I’m not a programmer by any means. I’m just cheap and don’t feel like tossing out perfectly functional hardware. So I push through it until I get it working.

    Yes most of the 3% of people that use the Linux can mostly use terminal easily. For the 97% of people who are not using Linux, terminal is way beyond their capabilities.



  • The_v@lemmy.worldtoFunny@sh.itjust.worksDon't panic!
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Terms referring to the kernels are combination phrases grain corn, sweet corn, popcorn, indian corn etc.

    The plant is a “corn plant”.

    Maize is rarely used but understood most commonly as “indian maize” as interchangeable with “indian corn”.

    If you don’t know the usage or type it’s common to use the general term like “corn field”.



  • There are many things that are unsupported in this article

    First off, the laboratory methodology changed for testing food. Modern testing techniques much more accurate than the ones in the 50’s and 70’s. They did not run the older methodologies on modern food. So basically the entire premise is comparing apples to oranges. We don’t know if the changes are due to reality or procedure changes.

    The second study on rice had me smiling. From somebody who knows nothing about breeding cereal grain it would seem to be a slam dunk, however reality is more complicated. All cereal breeders struggle with the tradeoff between maximizing yield and lodging resistance. Lodging is when the stalk falls over. When it falls over major yield losses can occur (50%+ depending on the stage). It also causes major difficulties with harvesting on equipment and time. Extra CO2 increases plant size and kernal size. A taller plant with a heavier seed head that a slight breeze will knock over. Breeders will select genetically smaller kernals and smaler stature plants to compensate for increasing CO2. This is the major reason that all hybrid wheat attempts have failed. It makes a huge plant that falls over.

    Some basics on nutritional density of vegetables.

    Fruit size: in general the larger the fruit lower the nutritional density. The plant only has so much it can create or pull from the soil.

    Nutrient density is affected by position on the plant where it is grown. Earlier set fruit tend to have higher nutritional density than later set fruit. You can look up more on this on source/sink studies.

    Nutrient availability: plants that are slightly nutritionally deficient will produce smaller fruits/seeds. The smaller size will make the fruit more nutrient dense.

    The weather is the single largest determining factor. When a plant is happy with ideal conditions the nutrient density is lower. When the plant is stressed and grows more slowly, it produces less yield with higher density food.

    Genetics: Sometimes plant breeders select for higher nutritional density like watermelons. Sometimes they select for lower density like strawberries. It all depends on the market requirements.