I’ll be honest when I saw the words “Welcome to the Internet” I completed skipped over that comment as irrelevant when going through the thread lol.

I’d personally still want more details before casting blame. Unfortunately we’ll never get those details. Either details were collected at the scene we dont know about, or it’s another failing of the justice system.

I hope she gets her money and more though. Door dash has no buisness withholding that from her.

“she was probably shit at her job and made everything up”.

Can you quote the whole of what you’re talking about here? I’m not seeing it in the chain. Possibly an edited comment.

He was allegedly visibly naked through the open door.

That’s the bit that I was unclear about. The article was vague and the commentors painted a different picture entirely. If she didn’t enter the home then there’s clearly no wrong doing on her part.

So that just leaves determining the man’s intent, but the police have refused to investigate the case.

Either because they’re inept (likely) or there are details we are unaware of.

The video evidence either showes her entering a home illegally or a man illegally exposing himself.

The only way to know would be to prove the man’s intentions and determine if the door was intentionally left open

Edit: It’s come to my attention that there is no evidence she entered the home at all. That’s a baseless claim being spread in this thread. The article is vague, and we don’t have sources to say one way or another

You’d have to have admission of guilt from the guy to prove anything.

I don’t know about you but I don’t try to enter stranger’s homes regardless of if the door is open or not.

This whole thing rests on “did he intentionally leave the door open with the intent to expose himself” or “did she illegally enter his home and saw him. The door being left open unintentionally”. We need a lot more facts to know for sure.

Edit: It’s come to my attention that there is no evidence she entered the home at all. That’s a baseless claim being spread in this thread. The article is vague on the matter. If he was visible from the door that changes things

You’re right it doesn’t matter if he was drunk or not.

If she entered his home without permission she’s at fault.

If he lured her in to expose himself intentionally then he’s at fault.

To the people asking “who orders delivery naked” it takes maybe 2 seconds to throw on shorts and a shirt. Or he could have a robe to put on

Either way we don’t have enough details to determine anything. The only thing we have enough facts on is doordash being scummy and stealing money from the driver

So if they re-circumcised their penis then it’s back to autism?

I’m going to shit in your bathroom, claim it for myself, and keep you out until it’s my bathroom

You are right and I’m sure I can find more common ground with the guy that owns the local pizza shop.

But remember all buisness need to pay employees less than the value of what they produce. That is inherently exploitation